Legal Opinion

Gill v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 10, 1948PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConn, J.

The question presented is whether in supplementary proceedings a third party order made under section 779 of the Civil Practice Act directing an employer of the judgment debtor to appear for examination and enjoining the employer from paying out any money due or to become due to the judgment debtor is a mandate of the court which obligates the employer to withhold all future earnings of the judgment debiólas they accrue, without a determination by the court first had of the reasonable requirements of the judgment debtor for maintenance and support of himself and those dependent upon him.

The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Kaplan v. PeyserNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. F. E. Compton & Co. v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  3. Matter of Reeves v. CrownshieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  4. McDonnell v. McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. Bergman v. BuechlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Balanoff v. NiosiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re EdelmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  3. Chamberlain v. ChamberlainNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Back v. WagemannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Chemical Corn Exchange Bank v. MonforteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API