Legal Opinion
Mary M. v. City of Los Angeles
California Supreme Court
Decided September 5, 1991No. S005910PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
54 Cal.3d 202 (1991)
814 P.2d 1341
285 Cal. Rptr. 99
MARY M., Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Appellant.
Docket No. S005910.
Supreme Court of California.
September 5, 1991.
COUNSEL
James K. Hahn, City Attorney, John T. Neville and Richard M. Helgeson, Assistant City Attorneys, Katherine J. Hamilton and Greg Wolff, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendant and Appellant.
Slatter & Slatter, Slatter, Slatter & Kiesel, Vann H. Slatter and Roni Keller for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
KENNARD, J.
Police officers occupy a unique position of trust in our society. They are…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Smith v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021