Legal Opinion
Seung Ja Cho v. In-Chul Song
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 2, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*130OPINION OF THE COURT
Stanley L. Sklar, J.
Is a doctor’s office at a university hospital his principal place of business for service of process while he is on sabbatical in Korea where he is engaged in teaching and research? I hold that it is not.
Defendant In-Chul Song, M.D. moves pursuant to CPLR 5015 to vacate a default entered against him. Plaintiffs Seung Ja Cho and Dali Hon Cho oppose vacatur of the default. Seung Ja Cho alleges that she came to defendant plastic surgeon’s office at 800A Fifth Avenue, New York City for a chemical peel treatment. Seung Ja Cho alleges that she had a severe…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Feinstein v. BergnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Macchia v. RussoNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Raschel v. RishNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- McMullen v. ArnoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Mayers v. Cadman Towers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Balendran v. North Shore Medical Group, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Dallas v. VosburghDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2019