Legal Opinion

Rollins v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Feom; the City Court of Montgomery. Tried before the Hon. Thomas M. Arring-toN. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

The defendants were indicted and convicted of grand larceny. The ownership of the property stolen was laid in Bichard Barrett. The proof showed “that the property alleged to have been stolen was the personal property of Georgia Barrett, wife of Bichard Barrett, and there was no testimony tending to show the husband to be the bailee or agent of the wife.” We have quoted all the evidence on the question, as it appears in the bill of exceptions.

The court charged the jury, “that although the proof showed that the property alleged to have been stolen was the property of Georgia Barrett, wife of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hornsby v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  2. Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Bruce v. BruceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Lavender v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. Memphis Charleston Railroad v. BynumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lacey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Crittenden v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Strauss Pritz & Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  5. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API