Legal Opinion

In the Matter of the Amendment of the Commission's Rule Regarding Applications for Certificates of Convenience and Necessity Kansas City Power and Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company v. Missouri Public Service Commission and Dogwood Energy

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 9, 2021No. SC98039Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI en banc IN THE MATTER OF THE AMENDMENT ) Opinion issued February 9, 2021 OF THE COMMISSION’S RULE ) REGARDING APPLICATIONS FOR ) CERTIFICATES OF CONVENIENCE AND ) NECESSITY; ) KANSAS CITY POWER AND LIGHT AND ) KCP&L GREATER MISSOURI ) OPERATIONS COMPANY, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) No. SC98039 ) MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE ) COMMISSION AND ) DOGWOOD ENERGY, ) ) Respondents. ) APPEAL FROM THE MISSOURI PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Kansas City Power & Light Company (“KCP&L”) and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations Company (“GMO” and, together with KCP&L, “the Companies”) appeal…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service Commission of MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. State Ex Rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. G. Steven Cox v. Kansas City Chiefs Football Club, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  4. State ex inf. Barker v. Kansas City Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Praxair, Inc. v. Missouri Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API