Legal Opinion

Northern Ohioans Protecting the Environment v. Shank

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1988No. 87AP-1051, 87AP-1052, 87AP-1053, 87AP-1054 and 87AP-1055PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, P.J.

Appellants, Northern Ohioans Protecting The Environment (“NOPE”), Merle Pearson, Kathryn Pearson and William Warner, appeal a decision of the Environmental Board of Review (“EBR”) and raise two assignments of error, as follows:

“I. The Environmental Board of Review erred in finding that the facility could be operated under a part A permit since it was not continuously in operation since before 9, 1980 [sic],
“II. The Environmental Board of Review erred in finding that the director acted lawfully when he issued per mit [sic] in its final form in which the terms and conditions of said permit did…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Cecos International, Inc. v. ShankOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. State v. Grooms, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API