Legal Opinion

State v. Beito

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 18, 2008No. 26379-7-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

195 P.3d 1023 (2008)

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant,

v.

Curtis Neil BEITO, Respondent.

No. 26379-7-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.

November 18, 2008.

Mark Erik Lindsey, Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.

Curtis Neil Beito, Spokane, WA, pro se.

BROWN, J.

¶ 1 Officers contacted Curtis N. Beito while he was a passenger in a vehicle parked outside a convenience store. When asked, he provided his name and birth date. Officers ran this information through their database and discovered Mr. Beito had a warrant for his arrest. In a search incident to…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. ReichenbachWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. SimpsonWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. MichielliWashington Supreme Court · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. State of Washington v. Otoniel CarrieroCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. State v. GanttCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. State Of Washington v. Jesus Junior VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  5. State Of Washington v. Nicco Daniel BlyeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API