Legal Opinion

(PC) Bettencourt v. Parker

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 3, 2022No. 1:16-cv-00150Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARY RAY BETTENCOURT, Case No. 1:16-cv-00150-DAD-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR NEW DOCKETING OF THE ENTIRE CASE 13 v. FILING AND EARLY NOTICE OF APPEAL OR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL 14 PARKER, et al., (ECF No. 105) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Gary Ray Bettencourt (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 18 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s claims of deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tom L. Ashlock v. Conseco Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Robin James, a Married Person in Her Separate Capacity v. Price Stern Sloan, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Penguin Putnam, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. RF Technologies Corp. v. Applied Microwave Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API