Legal Opinion

B. AND HS CORP. v. Holly

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 14, 1984PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

198 N.J. Super. 83 (1984)

486 A.2d 862

B. AND H.S. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ALBINAS HOLLY, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS.[1] CONSOLIDATED WITH: B. AND H.S. CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v.

WILLIAM W. INVENAL, ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.[1]

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 16, 1984.

Decided December 14, 1984.

Before Judges FRITZ, FURMAN and DEIGHAN.

Richard O. Venino argued the cause for appellants Middleton and Burpee interests.

Erwin D. Apell argued the cause for appellants Scott and Green interests (Apell and Mathews, attorneys; Donald N. Elsas, on the brief).

Edward C.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Judson v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co. of WestfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
  2. In Re AddonizioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  3. In Re PilloSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. State v. DeColaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Palamarg Realty Company v. RehacSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hyland v. KirkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Stransky v. Monmouth Council of Girl Scouts, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  3. Pontidis v. ShavelliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API