Legal Opinion

Guild v. Prentis

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 20, 1910PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Trespass for treble damages under P. S. 5842. Plea, tbe general issue. Trial by jury at tbe June Term, 1909, Windsor County, Hall, J., presiding. At tbe close of all tbe evidence tbe defendants moved for a directed verdict, for that the plaintiffs, being only lessees, could not maintain this action. Motion overruled, to which the defendants excepted.

Read the full summary

Trespass for treble damages under P. S. 5842. Plea, tbe general issue. Trial by jury at tbe June Term, 1909, Windsor County, Hall, J., presiding. At tbe close of all tbe evidence tbe defendants moved for a directed verdict, for that the plaintiffs, being only lessees, could not maintain this action. Motion overruled, to which the defendants excepted. The jury rendered a general verdict for the plaintiffs for $166, actual damages and answered in the negative the following special question: “Have the defendants satisfied you by a fair balance of evidence that in cutting such trees as you find…

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, J.

This action was brought under P. S. 5842 to recover treble damages for the cutting of trees on land held by the plaintiffs under a lease. The land in question was a small tract on the banks of the Connecticut in the town of Springfield of which the plaintiffs had a ten years’ lease and on which they had erected a summer cottage. At the time of the cutting of the trees, hereinafter referred to, the plaintiffs’ lease had about eight years to run. The owner of the land in fee simple at the time of the lease, after giving the same, conveyed to the defendants land, which included that in question,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Schott v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1884
  2. McConnel v. KibbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Riker v. HooperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1862
  4. Payne v. SheetsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1903
  5. Davenport v. NewtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1898

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Wellman v. MeadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1919
  2. Henderson v. ChesleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  3. Berlin Development Corp. v. Vermont Structural Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1968
  4. Shahi v. MaddenSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. Woodward Governor Co. v. City of Loves ParkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API