Legal Opinion
H a Smith Lumber & Hardware Co. v. Decina
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided April 27, 2005No. Docket 238521PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: TALBOT, EJ. and NEFF and KELLY, JJ. KELLY, J.
This case is before us by order of our Supreme Court, 1 which vacated part V of our decision in HA Smith Lumber & Hardware Co v Decina, 258 Mich App 419, 428-431; 670 NW2d 719 (2003), in which we concluded that the trial court properly ordered John Decina (Decina) to pay H. A. Smith Lumber and Hardware Company (Smith) and Williams Glass Company (Williams) attorney fees pursuant to the Construction Lien Act (CIA), MCL 570.1101 et seq. Our Supreme Court determined: “The Court of Appeals clearly erred by finding that the Oakland…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Popma v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
- Taylor v. LabanMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
- Solution Source, Inc. v. LPR Associates Ltd. PartnershipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
- Old Kent Bank v. Whitaker Construction Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1997
- HA Smith Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DecinaMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
- BJ'S & SONS CONST. CO., INC. v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Face Trading, Inc. v. Department of Consumer & Industry ServicesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- BJ'S & SONS CONST. CO., INC. v. Van SickleMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Ronnisch Construction Group, Inc v. Lofts on the Nine, LLCMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.