Legal Opinion

Rooks v. North Dakota Workers' Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1993No. Civ. 930006PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Wilmer Rooks appeals from a district court judgment affirming an order by the Workers’ Compensation Bureau that denied partial disability benefits to Rooks. Applying the preponderanee-of-the-evidence standard, as we do under NDCC 28-32-19(5) and 28-32-21, we affirm the decision of the Bureau.

Wilmer Rooks drove a truck for Hidatco, Inc. Rooks was injured on September 9, 1987, when he disconnected a hose from one tank to connect it to another. Hot oil in the hose splashed onto Rook’s arms, causing severe burns that required skin grafts. The Bureau accepted liability and paid…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Inglis v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Wendt v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Risch v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Pleinis v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Wherry v. North Dakota State HospitalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gronfur v. North Dakota Workers Compensation FundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Spangler v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Siewert v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Halseth v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Ollom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API