Legal Opinion
Joseph G. Essex v. Permobil, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided May 7, 2026No. 3:24-cv-01941Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOSEPH G. ESSEX, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 24-CV-01941-SPM PERMOBIL, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER McGLYNN, District Judge: Pending before the Court is Permobil Inc.’s Motion for Reconsideration or, in the alternative, Certification of Issues for Interlocutory Appeal. (Doc. 48). Also before the Court is Joseph Essex’s Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply. (Doc. 59). Having been fully informed of the issues presented, both Permobil and Essex’s respective Motions are DENIED. RELEVANT FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Federal Express Corp. v. HoloweckiSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.