Legal Opinion

State v. Hurlburt

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 7, 1990No. 88-455PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

Batchelder, J.

The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of RSA 159:3 (Supp. 1988). He appeals the Superior Court’s {Nadeau, J.) ruling granting the State’s pre-trial motion to exclude his anticipated cross-examination of one of the State’s witnesses, Irene Blanchard. The defendant pro se also contends that the court in three instances abused its discretion in refusing to allow him to introduce various forms of evidence. We cannot say that the court abused its discretion in the latter three instances, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Glenn Arthur McClintic Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  2. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. Zeta Chi FraternitySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
  2. Colorado v. SegoviaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
  3. State v. HurlburtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. NewellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996
  5. State v. HopkinsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API