Legal Opinion

DiBella v. Village of Ontario

Richland County Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 1, 1965No. 41795PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMayer, J.

The defendant, Multi-Channel T. V. Cable Company of Mansfield, has demurred to the petition herein on five grounds: Defect of parties plaintiff, misjoinder of parties defendant, improper joinder of several causes of action, that separate causes of action against several defendants are improperly joined, and that the petition does not state facts which show a cause of action.

Plaintiff, in his petition, says he is a taxpayer of Ontario and brings this suit, filed March 11,1965, on behalf of the village after written request, on February 26, 1965, was refused by the village solicitor. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Watson Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Leavers v. City of CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Alcorn v. Cinci. Traction Co.Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Greater Fremont, Inc. v. City of FremontDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1968
  2. Vernon v. Warner Amex Cable Communications, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Sparrow v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API