Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dominguez v. Beame

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 28, 1979No. 460, Docket 78-7353Published

1DissentDooling, District Judge

The evidence, it would appear, does not support the trial court’s finding that the defendants Bonarti and Colletti had established a defense of good faith. Leaving to one side the question whether Officer Colletti was sufficiently a participant in rather than a bystander at the arrest, the evidence seems plainly to preclude a finding that the officers could reasonably have believed that the arrest was supported by probable cause. The disorderly conduct statute, Penal Law, § 240.20, subdivision 5, had a settled meaning that went back to the predecessor statute, Section 722, subdivision 2, of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API