Mead Corp. v. Blackmon
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
Judge Osgood Williams who heard and decided this case wrote a scholarly and well considered opinion which we adopt here as our opinion in this case. Whether or not the lithographs, flexographic engraving, templates and so on were the property of the customer, and what value should be assigned to them, were questions of fact as to which there was sufficient evidence in the stipulation of the parties to support the court’s finding that the Commissioner had made out a prima facie case. We therefore quote Judge Williams’ opinion in this case as follows: "Mead Corporation contends that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Undercofler v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Superior Type, Inc. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Undercofler v. ErnhardtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Undercofler v. Foote & Davies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Undercofler v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Middlesex Water Co. v. Taxation Div. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1981
- Media Graphics, Inc. v. DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1984
- Telepages, Inc. v. BaldwinNew Jersey Tax Court · 1987
- Chemical New Jersey Holdings, Inc. v. Director, New Jersey Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Carling Brewing Co. v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974