Legal Opinion

Mills v. Brooklyn City Railroad

New York City Court

Decided October 15, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from judgment in favor of the plaintiff, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from order denying motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborne, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff through the alleged negligence of defendant. Plaintiff obtained a verdict, and from. *2the judgment entered thereon, and also from the order denying a motion for a new trial, defendant appeals.

The counsel for the appellant contends that the learned trial judge erred in denying the motion made to dismiss the complaint at the close of the plaintiff’s case, and again upon the whole case; which rulings were duly excepted to.

The testimony of and on behalf of plaintiff shows that on the 4th day of February, 1893, between…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wells v. Brooklyn City RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Friedman v. . Dry Dock, East Broadway and Battery Rd. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Friedman v. Dry-Dock, East Broadway & Battery RailroadNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lunde v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  2. NJ Home Builders Ass'n v. Div. on Civil RightsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  3. Pacific Discount Co., Inc. v. JacksonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Commercial Can Corp. v. STEEL METAL, ETC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  5. Duffy v. Interurban Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API