State v. Beylund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for the manufacture of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and statements obtained during and after a search of a building on his property. We review for errors of law, ORS 138.220, and affirm.
Based on information that defendant was growing marijuana, Officer Bennett drove out to defendant’s property with Officer Gilbert to seek consent to search it. 1 The officers drove past a “no trespassing” sign posted beside an open gate on the driveway to reach the house. Neither…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. GuzmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. Rocha-RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. SurfaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. A. S. (In re A. S.)Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.