Legal Opinion

Browne v. Waldo

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided February 6, 2024No. 2:20-cv-00196Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION KATHY BROWNE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:20-CV-196 JD JENNIFER WALDO, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER Now before the Court is the Counter-Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”), Jennifer Waldo’s, motion in limine. (DE 414.) The Counter-Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant”), Kathy Browne, has responded and thus the motion is ripe. As a preliminary matter, the Court will note that Ms. Browne’s response to the motion in limine does not substantively respond to any of the requests by Ms. Waldo, rather it rehashes or raises new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Montano v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  3. Terrance Thompson v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Betts v. CITY OF CHICAGO, ILL.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. PT BUNTIN, MD, PC v. BeckerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API