Legal Opinion

Ambrosio v. Disimino

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1963PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.

This motion for review of the taxation of costs (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1536) is based on the ground that the plaintiffs are not entitled to costs and disbursements under subdivision 3 of section 1474 of the Civil Practice Act.

The defendants in this consolidated action are residents of New Jersey, and service of process was effected on them through the Secretary of State (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 253). The plaintiffs recovered a total judgment of $1,275 and no one plaintiff recovered more than $300.

Since the defendants are not residents of Nassau County, it is quite clear that no jurisdiction…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gruber v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Shaw v. Wolt, New York County Courts1960

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bonk v. Hodgkins, New York County Courts1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API