Hyundai Motor Co. v. Alvarado
Texas Supreme Court
1Dissent
OWEN, Justice,
joined by PHILLIPS, Chief Justice, and HECHT and ENOCH, Justices, dissenting.
Fundamentally, the issue in this case is whether Congress intended in the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1966 to leave the decision as to what occupant restraints should be provided in vehicles to the Secretary of Transportation or to leave that decision to juries across America. Not surprisingly, a solid majority of the courts to consider this issue have held that Congress intended that the Secretary make this determination. The issue of what safety restraints should be required…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.