Szilagyi v. Szilagyi

In affirming the order appealed from, we do not adopt the reasoning of the trial justice or his construction of the Domestic Relations Court Act (§ 92, subd. [4]; § 101) with respect to possible liability of the appellant Marie Szilagyi, the paternal grandmother, or the father for support of the former’s grandson, William Szilagyi, after the age of seventeen years. Upon the question thus presented we do not now pass.

The amount of arrears owed by Marie Szilagyi was not fixed except in the sum of $90. At the conclusion of the hearing it was left to counsel to endeavor to agree upon the balance…