Legal Opinion

Schoot v. United States

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 6, 1987No. 86 C 0179PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ASPEN, District Judge:

Roger C. Vorbau (“Vorbau”), counter-defendant and cross-defendant in this tax refund and penalty action, brings these motions to dismiss under F.R.Civ.P. 12 the counterclaim of the United States of America and the cross-claim of Robert R. Schoot (“Schoot”). For the reasons noted below, we deny Vorbau’s motion as to the counterclaim, but grant it as to the cross-claim.

FACTS 1

On August 8, 1983, Schoot and Vorbau were each assessed a 100% penalty (held jointly and severally liable) of $47,194.53 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672 (“section 6672”) for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Alfred M. Sinder, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant, and Angelo Ventrone, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
  3. Moats v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
  4. Rebelle v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
  5. Swift v. LevesqueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Lyon v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Wynne v. Fischer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  3. Bick v. Peat Marwick & MainCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
  4. Aardema v. FitchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Cook v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API