Schoot v. United States
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Roger C. Vorbau (“Vorbau”), counter-defendant and cross-defendant in this tax refund and penalty action, brings these motions to dismiss under F.R.Civ.P. 12 the counterclaim of the United States of America and the cross-claim of Robert R. Schoot (“Schoot”). For the reasons noted below, we deny Vorbau’s motion as to the counterclaim, but grant it as to the cross-claim.
FACTS 1
On August 8, 1983, Schoot and Vorbau were each assessed a 100% penalty (held jointly and severally liable) of $47,194.53 pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6672 (“section 6672”) for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Laue v. LeifheitIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Alfred M. Sinder, Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Cross-Appellant, and Angelo Ventrone, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Moats v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1983
- Rebelle v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1984
- Swift v. LevesqueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lyon v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Wynne v. Fischer, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Bick v. Peat Marwick & MainCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1990
- Aardema v. FitchAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
- Cook v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.