King v. McNab
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*809Appellants Demarest and Grathwohl, as objectors to the petition nominating King, were necessary parties to the first proceeding. Since the petitioner King failed to join them as parties thereto, the court lacked jurisdiction to make any order affecting the nominating petition (Matter of Swam v. Cohen, 286 N. Y. 678). It cannot be said that the objectors waived this jurisdictional defect. On the contrary, they affirmatively urged it when they interposed a special appearance in the King proceeding and moved to dismiss it on the ground that they were indispensable parties and had not been served…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Matter of Swan v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. Westchester County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Detres v. Westchester County Board of ElectionsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1990
- Williams v. Westchester County Board of ElectionsNew York Supreme Court · 2009