Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided November 9, 1926No. Docket No. 9380PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Value of gross estate determined.

1Opinion of the Court

*388OPINION.

Smith:

The petitioner alleges error on the part of the Commissioner with respect to the $2,000 homestead exemption. It is very evident, however, from the findings of fact, that the Commissioner has not included in the value of the gross estate shown in the deficiency letter the $2,000 homestead exemption.

The only other point in issue is whether there should be included in the value of the gross estate $97,500 as the value of the real estate, and in addition $7,458.89 for the landlord’s portion of the 1923 crops, most of which were unmatured and ungathered at the date of his decease.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitcham v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. Chancellor v. TeelSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Marx v. NelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owen v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Irrgang v. FahsDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1950
  3. Estate of Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  4. Estate of Roberts v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Peebles v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API