Legal Opinion

Butler v. Astrue

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 24, 2011No. Civil 09-1378-AAPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, Chief Judge:

Claimant, Holly Butler, brings this action pursuant to the Social Security Act (the Act), 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), to obtain judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner. The Commissioner denied plaintiffs applications for Title II disability insurance benefits (DIB) and Title XVI supplemental security income (SSI) disability benefits under the Act. For the reasons set forth below, the Commissioner’s decision is affirmed and this case is dismissed.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

On August 24, 2005, plaintiff protectively filed applications for both DIB and SSI.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Danaher Corporation v. Lean Focus LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2020
  2. Kathleen Dalli v. Andrew SaulDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  3. Rosenbaum v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
  4. Sou v. SaulDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020
  5. WILLS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API