Bonnel v. Shirley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Carroll Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcBride, J.
The brief filed by counsel for the appellant contains nothing whatever by way of argument, or citation of authority. Nor is there even a suggestion of any reason, or ground, for holding the action of the court below erroneous.
We find nothing in it but a bare assertion of error. Such a brief presents no question for our consideration. Harrison v. Hedges, 60 Ind. 266; Bray v. Franklin Life Ins. Co., 68 Ind. 6; Landwerlen v. Wheeler, 106 Ind. 523, and many other cases.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Bray v. Franklin Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Harrison v. HedgesIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eckman v. FunderburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1915
- Guy v. BlueIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Chicago and Erie Railroad Co. v. BarnesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
- Meno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
- Sullivan v. HoopengarnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911