Legal Opinion

Hill v. Southeastern Floor Covering

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1992No. 89-CA-0274PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Southeastern Floor Covering Company, Inc., hereinafter (Southeastern) did jobs in floor covering and ceilings for general contractors. Danny Hill was an employee of Southeastern and acted as general manager, with authority to prepare bid proposals and submit them to general contractors. In 1983, Hill worked up a bid for Southeastern for a job with Chata Construction Company for asbestos encapsulation, ceramic tile, ceiling, carpet and vinyl tile. The asbestos encapsulation bid had to be withdrawn because Southeastern was not licensed by the Environmental Protection Agency to do asbestos work.

S…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bell v. ParkerMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Fought v. MorrisMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Gibson v. ManuelMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Ellzey v. Fyr-Pruf, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Omnibank of Mantee v. United Southern BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Sellers v. SellersMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Chantey Music Pub., Inc. v. Malaco, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Draper v. DraperMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Derouen v. MurrayMississippi Supreme Court · 1992

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API