Legal Opinion

Lily Keyser Maria Sofia Robledo Richard M. Cisneros v. Sacramento City Unified School District, a Public Entity and and James Sweeney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 12, 2001No. 99-17562PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

265 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2001)

LILY KEYSER; MARIA SOFIA ROBLEDO; RICHARD M. CISNEROS, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, a public entity; and AND JAMES SWEENEY, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 99-17562

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted, October 31, 2000

Filed February 7, 2001

Amended September 12, 2001

NOTE: SEE OPINION AT 238 F.3d 1132.[Copyrighted Material Omitted]

Matthew J. Smith, Wilke, Fleury, Hoffelt, Gould & Birney, Sacramento, California, for the plaintiffs-appellants.

Michael W. Pott, Porter, Scott, Weiberg & Delehant, Sacramento,…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Pickering v. Board of Ed. of Township High School Dist. 205, Will Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Waters v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Board of Comm'rs, Wabaunsee Cty. v. UmbehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. (PC) Bernal v. BeardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API