Legal Opinion
Modern Remodeling, Inc. v. Tripod Holdings, LLC
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 10, 2022No. 1:19-cv-01397Unknown
1Opinion
CONCLUSION For the reasons discussed above, the defendants’ motions to alter or amend the judgments or for new trials (ECFs 270, 272, 274) will be Denied. MRI’s motion for attorneys’ fees (ECF 267) will be Granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this memorandum.’ A separate Order follows. ? e/2Lz Da Catherine C. Blake United States District Judge 7 MRI’s motion for its bill of costs (ECF 275; responses at ECF 344 and ECF 348; reply at ECF 351) will be handled initially by the Clerk at the appropriate time. See Local Rule 109 (D. Md. 2021). 18 C. Re-opened Deposition As conceded by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Pacific Insurance Company v. American National Fire Insurance Company, Rail Link, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Grissom v. the Mills Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Keith W. Cline v. Wal-Mart Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Daly v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.