Legal Opinion

Stanton v. Hyatt Corp.

District Court, Virgin Islands

Decided April 29, 1999No. Civil No. 98-106PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM

Pending before the Court is defendant Hyatt Corporation's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue or, alternatively, to transfer it to an appropriate district.

*276INTRODUCTION

This matter stems from the long and turbulent relationship which culminated in Government Guarantee Fund of The Republic of Finland, Saastapankkien Keskus-osake-pankki (Skopbank), 35 Acres Associates, 12 Acres Associates and Benefori Oy [the "Skopbank Parties"] v. Hyatt Corporation, Civil No. 1995-49 ["Skopbank v. Hyatt" or "GGF v. Hyatt"]. The history of the case, which settled on…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Urgent v. Technical Assistance Bureau, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2003
  2. In Re Charles Schwab & Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1999
  3. Xinuos, Inc. v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
  4. Xinuos, Inc. v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API