Legal Opinion

Bombardier Aerospace Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 25, 2016No. 15-10468PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE H. SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judge:

Bombardier Aerospace Corporation claims it is not required to remit federal excise tax on fees collected from participants in its fractional-aircraft-ownership program. The district court disagreed and ruled in favor of the Government on cross-motions for summary judgment. We AFFIRM.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

During the successive quarterly tax periods in 2006 and 2007, which are the ones relevant here, Bombardier Aerospace Corporation operated a fractional-aircraft-ownership program called “Flexjet.” Flex-jet participants bought fractional interests in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. S&w Enterprises, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, Na, an Alabama Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. United States v. Ceballos-TorresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. IberiaBank v. Darryl BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Seago v. O'MalleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  3. Baker Hughes, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Baker Hughes Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  5. AK Meeting IP LLC v. Zoho CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API