United States v. Brandon Taylor
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.
Brandon Taylor pleaded guilty, without the benefit of a plea agreement, to multiple counts of carjacking, brandishing a firearm during a crime of violence, and robbery of United States property. On appeal, Taylor contends that because he lacked the requisite intent to commit carjacking, the district court violated Fed. R.Crim.P. 11(b)(3) by failing to ensure that a sufficient factual basis for the offenses existed. We find that the district court established a satisfactory factual basis for 'Taylor’s pleas and affirm.
I
Taylor and his co-defendant, Shawnta…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- United States v. Bernard Chester WebbCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kiet Hoang Nguyen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- United States v. LouchartCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Seth WindhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Arvis Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Raymond BinneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.