Legal Opinion

Doe v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES, LTD

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided August 21, 2024No. 1:23-cv-24236Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 23-cv-24236-BLOOM/Torres JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. NORWEIGAN CRUISE LINES, LTD, NORWEIGAN CRUISE LINE, and JOHN ROE, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER ON MOTION TO INTERVENE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon non-party XO Cruise, LLC’s (“XO Cruise”) Motion to Intervene (“Motion”), ECF No. [72]. Plaintiff Jane Doe filed a Response in Opposition, ECF No. [74].1 For the reasons explained below, XO Cruise’s Motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND XO Cruise represents it “entered into an agreement with NCL to host the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  5. Meek v. Metropolitan Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API