Doe v. NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINES, LTD
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 23-cv-24236-BLOOM/Torres JANE DOE, Plaintiff, v. NORWEIGAN CRUISE LINES, LTD, NORWEIGAN CRUISE LINE, and JOHN ROE, Defendants. _________________________________/ ORDER ON MOTION TO INTERVENE THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon non-party XO Cruise, LLC’s (“XO Cruise”) Motion to Intervene (“Motion”), ECF No. [72]. Plaintiff Jane Doe filed a Response in Opposition, ECF No. [74].1 For the reasons explained below, XO Cruise’s Motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND XO Cruise represents it “entered into an agreement with NCL to host the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Lawton Chiles, Jr., Bob Martinez, Metropolitan Dade County, Intervenors-Appellants v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Diaz v. Southern Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Meek v. Metropolitan Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.