State ex rel. Wright v. Tomlinson
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Montgomery Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.
-The complaint in this case is upon the bond of a special administrator; George N. Tomlinson, and his sureties, Wm. Tomlinson and David Hartman.
The complaint is in two paragraphs. A copy of the bond is filed with each paragraph.
The breaches of the bond assigned are that Tomlin-son, special administrator, received the sum of $1,-973.88 which he converted to his own use and the use of others.
*664Second — That said special administrator failed to preserve the property of the estate which came into his hands.
Third — That said special administrator had knowledge of a large amount of personal property…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Bank of Washington v. HumeSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Supreme Conclave v. CappellaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
- Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. ChildMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Pence v. MakepeaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Chapman v. McIlwrathSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. RitcheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- First National Bank v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
- Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1944
- Manning v. Wallace (In Re First Financial Associates, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 2007
- Stewart v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.