Legal Opinion

Dodd v. Indiana Department of Correction

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided January 3, 2023No. 3:22-cv-00322Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION JERMAINE D’SHANN DODD, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:22-CV-322-DRL-MGG INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Jermaine D’Shann Dodd, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed an amended complaint. ECF 6. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.” Erickson v. Pardus,

551 U.S. 89, 94

(2007) (quotation marks and citations omitted). Nevertheless, under 28…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API