Legal Opinion

Pruitt v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 5, 1992No. 23724PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This matter is before the Court by way of a petition for a writ of certiorari from an order of Judge Patterson finding that petitioner was entitled to review under Austin v. State 1 of an order issued by Judge Brown denying, after a hearing, petitioner’s application for postconviction relief (PCR). The State does not contest the finding that petitioner is entitled to an Austin review. Accordingly, we grant certiorari, dispense with further briefing, and proceed with a review of the questions asserting error in Judge Brown’s order.

Petitioner asserts that his trial counsel was ineffective for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Austin v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. McCray v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re the Treatment & Care of LuckabaughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Al-Shabazz v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  4. Singleton v. ShererCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Humbert v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API