Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Espejo-Norton v. Merry

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 7, 2004No. 3D03-1576Published

1ConcurrenceSchwartz, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

This is a fascinating case in which one of the two goddaughters who were the named residual devisees of the testatrix’s $400,-000.00-plus estate turned up several years after the estate had been closed, after she had quite erroneously been declared dead by the circuit court, and after all the proceeds had been distributed to the other devisee. Because, insofar as the record shows,1 diligent, although futile, efforts had been expended to find her, I must agree with affirmance of the order before us denying her motion to reopen the estate. See Estate of Bateman, 290 So.2d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. BallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Hewitt v. HewittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
  3. Kramer v. FreedmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Kramer v. FreedmanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. In Re Estate of BatemanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API