Heard v. State

Shulman, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from appellant’s conviction for burglary. He raises issues concerning the admissibility of his confession and the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm.

1. While in jail after being arrested on the charge in this case, appellant was interviewed by a detective from a different county concerning a different crime. During that interview, appellant expressed interest in discussing the burglary for which he had been arrested. The detective to whom appellant expressed that interest then summoned a local police officer who took appellant’s statement and testified…