In re Lesser
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
On Petition to Eeview an Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. The petition for review is filed on behalf of the Ninth National Bank of the City of New York, a creditor of the bankrupts.
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The bankrupts are co-partners formerly doing business under the name of Lesser Bros. In October, 1896, they transferred their property and executed certain confessions of judgment in the state court, upon which judgments levies were made. *914They further instituted an action in .the state court for dissolution of co-partnership, in which a receiver was appointed. The petitioner charges that all these proceedings were fraudulent and collusive. In November and December, 1896, the petitioner, the Ninth National Bank, obtained two judgments against.the Lessers in the supreme…
2Cited by8 opinions
- In re WilderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900
- In re GoldbergDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1902
- Teperman v. Ruthmay Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- Mulford v. Fourth Street Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1907
- Hirsh, Newman, Reass & Becker v. Capital Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1938
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.