Legal Opinion

Fernandez v. Chao

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 17, 2003No. Court 02-00183Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EATON, Judge:

Before the court are Sara Fernandez, Marisela Quintero, and Rosa Schmidt’s (“Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (“Mot. Leave File”) and, on behalf of the United States Department of Labor (“Labor”), the United States’ (“Government”) Motion to Dismiss (“Mot. Dismiss”). By their motion Plaintiffs seek to amend the Complaint filed with this court on February 22, 2002, to include allegations relating to events that occurred subsequent to its filing. Specifically, Plaintiffs seek to include the determination contained in the Notice of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API