Vaccarello v. Vaccarello
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1DissentNigro, Justice
The Majority concludes that the contract at issue is a postnuptial agreement because it finds that when Joseph and Sara Vaccarello entered into their “Separation and Property Settlement Agreement” in April of 1981, a short time after Joseph moved out of the marital home, they intended for that agreement to be binding even in the event that they reconciled their differences and resumed living together as husband and wife. Because I do not believe that the parties intended to enter into a postnuptial agreement, I respectfully dissent.
It is well-settled law in Pennsylvania that a husband and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wagner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Ray's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Makowski v. MakowskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Wareham ex rel. Trout v. WarehamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998