Legal Opinion

Miners Bank v. Ingham

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County

Decided March 29, 1932No. 126Published

1Opinion of the Court

Reese, P. J.,

— This is a rule for judgment for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense. The plaintiff bank brought suit on a promissory note for $400, made by Mulford Morris on February 9, 1929, payable three months after date, and endorsed by the defendant. The statement of claim contains the usual averments that the bank became the owner of the note for value before maturity; that the note was duly presented for payment at maturity and payment refused, and that notice of the protest was given to the defendant.

Defendant’s affidavit of defense admits that the bank is a corporation and that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Buehler v. United States Fashion Plate Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Parry v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Pain v. PackardNew York Supreme Court · 1816
  4. Pittsburgh-Westmoreland Coal Co. v. . KerrNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Fulton Farmers Ass'n v. BombergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API