Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Attorney-General v. Conrades

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Information in the nature of a quo warranto.

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, Judge

The attorney-general has filed in this court an information in the nature of a quo warranto, the object and nature of which is to oust the defendant Conrades from the office of county judge of St. Louis county, which he now holds and occupies.

The information states that one Benj. Charles was, according to law, elected a judge of the St. Louis County Court, on the first Tuesday next after the first Monday in November, 1863,'to serve for the term of six years, and up to the first Monday in August, 1869; that under and by virtue of what is known as the vacating ordinance, said Charles was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rodwell v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Stephens v. ReidSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  3. Wendorff v. DillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. People ex rel. Webster v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Territory ex rel. McKinnis v. HandSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API