State v. Rodriguez
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZMAN, Judge.
Gilberto F. Rodriguez appeals from the district court’s partial denial of his motion to strike portions of his presentence investigation report. Rodriguez also asserts that his unified sentence of thirty years, with ten years fixed, is excessive. For the reasons set forth, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
In accordance with a plea agreement, Gilberto F. Rodriguez pled guilty to two counts of delivery of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, in violation of I.C. § 37-2732(a)(1)(A). At his sentencing hearing Rodriguez made a motion to strike portions of his presentence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. ToohillIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. HedgerIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BroadheadIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CarrascoIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. BurdettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. GoodlettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. OgdenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. LancasterIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. Golden, Sr.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2020
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.