Legal Opinion
Walsh v. Davidson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 23, 1939No. Patent Appeals 4028, 4030, 4031PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATFIELD, Associate Judge.
These are appeals in interference proceedings from the decisions of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decisions of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee Iwan Ostromislensky in interference No. 65,251, and to appellees James F. Walsh and Amerigo F. Caprio in interference No. 63,781.
Interference No. 65,251 involves three parties. The two unsuccessful parties in the Patent Office (James F. Walsh and Amerigo F. Caprio, in appeal No. 4028, and Joseph G. Davidson, in appeal No. 4031) have appealed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blodgett v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Knutson v. GallsworthyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Marion Den Beste v. Harry MartinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
- Kyrides v. AndersenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
- Josef Fried, David Perlman, Richard W. Thoma, and Elwood O. Titus v. Herbert C. Murray, and Durey H. PetersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1959