S.J.S. Ex Rel. L.S. v. Faribault County
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Appellants argue the district court erred in determining that prosecutorial immunity and vicarious prosecutorial immunity protected respondents from appellants’ claims under the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act. We affirm.
FACTS
When appellant S.J.S. was 15 years old, she disclosed in a treatment setting that she had been the victim of criminal sexual conduct. During a subsequent interview with the police, S.J.S. gave detailed descriptions of several incidents of criminal sexual conduct and identified C.H. as the perpetrator of some of these offenses. The police…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elzie v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Brown v. Dayton Hudson Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Erickson v. County of ClayCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- White v. MoulderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Nation v. State, Dept. of CorrectionIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Backlund v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
- Christoffersen v. STATE, COURT CUSTODYAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Appell v. Giaccone, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1997
- Foster, Eric v. Carver County Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.