Legal Opinion
Ives Laboratories, Inc. v. Darby Drug Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 11, 1979No. 529, Docket 78-7454PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
This appeal from an order of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York denying a motion of plaintiff, Ives Laboratories, Inc., for a preliminary injunction, 455 F.Supp. 939 (1978), raises interesting questions of the application of Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Company, 376 U.S. 225, 84 S.Ct. 784, 11 L.Ed.2d 661 (1964) and Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc., 376 U.S. 234, 84 S.Ct. 779, 11 L.Ed.2d 669 (1964), to the imitation of a peripheral vasodilator, dispensed only on a physician’s prescription, once covered by a patent now expired and still…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Kewanee Oil Co. v. Bicron Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, Inc. v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd. And Michael ZaffaranoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- John H. Harland Company, Cross-Appellant v. Clarke Checks, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- In re Morton-Norwich Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Vuitton Et Fils S.A. v. J. Young Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Vibrant Sales, Inc. v. The New Body Boutique, Inc., Maximum Exposure Advertising Inc., Harvey S. Fishman and Avram C. FreedbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.