Legal Opinion

Frolich Barbour v. Hanson

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mh. Justice Chambliss

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The hill in this case was filed in the Chancery Court of Dyer County against C. C. Hanson, alleged to be a resident of Shelby County, having in Dyer County an office and resident agent, and doing business there, under the name of Churchill Compress. Service was had upon G W. Smitheal as such resident agent, pursuant to Section 4542 of Shannon’s Code which provides that:

“When a corporation, company, or individual, has an office or agency, or resident director, in any connty other than that in which the chief officer or principal resides,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flexner v. FarsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Green v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Knox Bros. v. E. W. Wagner & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDaniel v. Textile Workers Union of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
  2. Davidson v. Henry L. Doherty & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  3. Robertson v. Cumberland Gap Fuel Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API